Commentary for Bava Kamma 210:23

ואם איתא בכפירה הוא דאיפסיל ליה

Now, since the concluding clause deals with a case where an oath was taken, must not the commencing clause deal with a case where no oath was taken?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The penalty thus being his becoming liable for all accidents. ');">³⁶</span> — It may, however, be said that the one clause as well as the other deals with a case where an oath was taken. But while in the case of the concluding clause the defendant admitted [his perjury], in that of the commencing clause witnesses appeared and proved it. Where witnesses appeared and proved the perjury,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case Lev. V, 21-24 does not apply as gathered from Num. V, 7; v. infra 108b. ');">³⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 210:23. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.